That saif, I have a problem with the Fujifilm, but it's not linked to the camera itself but to the lenses: both the Fujinon XF 35mmF1.4 R and XF 56mmF1.2 R scream for a refresh! Even if they are faster than ever with the X-T3, their 'old schoold' AF gear falls short compared to more modern linear motor gear. Eye AF is damn good on both, even if short of perfect. I did not do scientific tests, but both camera have very solid AF performance. That's up to you to determine if it's important to you! If you do a lot of color grading, you get smoother tonal transitions and more details in the shadows. If you don't color grade your photos or don't pixel peep/print gigantic size, that difference might be irrelevant. Which means incredibly clean shwadows and a f***ing lot of data for post-processing. Basically, I can put about 4 times mores light on the Sony sensor in 'broad light conditons'. ISO160, but it's more like a stop difference due to different ISO rating method). But if you want to catch a todler in action, this is no help!Īs strange as it may sound, in my case the Sony ISO advantage is relevant at.base ISO. With IBIS you can make city nightscapes handheld, which is just stunning. It really depends on the focal length (the longer, the higher the advantage), the subject (if it's moving, IBIS is no help), the framing (the closer I get, the less IBIS is efficient, plus the more subject motions are critical), etc. So it really depends on your photography. But when does it make a lot of difference is also a complicated question. In my case, what can make a lot of difference is IBIS, not the sensor size! Especially since Fujifilm prime lenses are usually not stabilized. So in my case, the larger sensor of the Sony does not make a difference when it comes to 'low light performance'. But in practise, when with the Sony I use the 85mm with the Fujifilm I use the 56mm This results in same angle of view, same depth of field.and pretty similar noise level because I shoot at lower ISO value with the Fujifilm. Indeed, at the same ISO rating the Sony has a good stop advantage in terms of noise. This has a strong implication when it comes to 'low light performances'. At the beginning, I was only looking for 'equivalent' focal lengths, not 'equivalents' apertures.but my decision process led me to 'equivalent' apertures too. This process ended up getting 'equivalent' lenses for most of both my Fujifilm and my Sony gear ( e.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |